Case Study #1

Construction Design Firm Owner

1. Client Snapshot

ItemDetails
Business TypeConstruction design firm
LocationToronto
OwnerFemale, age 46
Annual Profit~$500K
Retained Earnings~$2.5M

The owner operates a profitable project-based design business with strong retained earnings accumulation inside the corporation.

2. Planning Challenge

  • Corporate earnings accumulation exceeding efficient distribution capacity
  • Dividend extraction would result in significant personal-level taxation
  • Need to balance liquidity, retirement planning, and estate objectives

3. Strategy Framework

Implementation Structure (Illustrative)

  • Policy type: Corporate-owned participating whole life insurance
  • Initial death benefit: ~$2.64M
  • Annual premium: $100,000
  • Funding period: 20 years
  • Structure designed to align with corporate cash flow capacity
  • No external financing integration required
StepPlanning ElementPurpose
Step 1Corporate-owned participating life insuranceReposition corporate surplus into long-term planning asset
Step 2CDA-focused estate structureEnable future tax-free capital dividend capacity
Step 3Collateral lending flexibilityPreserve liquidity and optional retirement income

4. Before vs After Structuring

Planning DimensionBefore StructuringAfter Structuring
Ownership StructureOwner holds all growth in OpCo/HoldCoGrowth partially repositioned into structured corporate asset
Growth AllocationAll appreciation increases estate tax exposureFuture value partially converted to insurance-backed estate asset
Retirement LiquidityDependent on dividends or asset saleCollateral lending flexibility available
Tax Exposure at DeathCorporate value subject to taxationCDA mechanism provides tax-efficient distribution capacity
Asset Risk ProfileConcentrated in operating businessDiversified into insurance asset class
Estate Transfer EfficiencyTaxable wealth transferStructured tax-advantaged estate liquidity

5. Financial Outcome (Illustrative, projected to age 90)

Projections are based on current dividend scale assumptions for comparative planning purposes. Two planning scenarios were evaluated:

If retirement income is used (Collateral Loan Approach), from age 66 to 85

  • Projected access to~$170K/year
  • Remaining estate benefit~$3.75M
  • CDA credit created~$8.72M

Collateral loan note: CDA credit is generally based on insurance proceeds received (less ACB) and is not reduced by subsequent use of proceeds, including loan repayment.

If retirement income is not used (Estate-focused outcome)

  • Projected death benefit~$9.37M
  • CDA credit~$8.72M

CDA note (general): At death, a CDA credit is generally created equal to insurance proceeds minus ACB, enabling a tax-free capital dividend to shareholders.

6. Planning Impact

  • Corporate surplus converted into tax-efficient estate asset
  • Liquidity flexibility without forced dividend extraction
  • Structured intergenerational wealth transfer

7. Professional Summary

This case demonstrates how corporate retained earnings can be repositioned into a long-term corporate estate planning framework while preserving liquidity and retirement flexibility.

Next Step

A confidential review can assess whether a similar corporate estate planning structure aligns with your tax profile and long-term planning objectives.

Book a Private Strategy Review